For a majority of students enrolled at IGNOU The review of books is the most confusing aspect of the work. This is especially the case for students working on IGNOU's MCOM Project IGNOU projects, where academic depth is expected. However, instruction often isn't as clear. Students usually ask if must write summaries of books, rewrite journal articles, or simply collect quotes. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing this distinction can alter the quality of the entire project.

A literature review is not intended to demonstrate how much literature you've read. It is written to show how well you comprehend the previous work that pertains to your subject and how your project is integrated into it. IGNOU assessment experts are attuned to this chapter due to your ability to link ideas with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before completing any work, it is important to understand why this chapter is necessary in an ignou mcom project. The review of literature serves three major purposes.

First, it demonstrates that the area you've selected already has been explored as well as having a relevance for academic studies. Furthermore, it will help you detect gaps or deficiencies in prior research. Thirdly, it serves as an outline for your research goals and the methodology.

Many students approach this chapter as a formality and copy content from their previous projects or online sources. This is a common practice that results in low marks or project rejection. IGNOU expects original writing even in discussions of studies already completed.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write at the level of the PhD thesis. However extremely basic explanations are discouraged. For a project involving ignou MCOM the literature review will reflect understanding that is postgraduate.

You're expected to study research papers, books journal articles, reports, as well as government publications that are related to your field of study. The primary focus should be on research that directly pertain to your area of study.

For instance, if your research is focused on the financial performance of banks If so, your literature analysis should concentrate on studies that have been conducted previously concerning financial ratios profitability analysis of bank operations, performance in banking and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

The most frequent mistake that students make is combining too many irrelevant sources. It's more about quality than quantity. For a project involving ignou mcom roughly fifteen to twenty quality sources are usually sufficient if they are well chosen.

Excellent sources include academic journals well-known books written by renowned authors RBI documents, Government reports and university research papers. Websites with ambiguous authorship should be avoided.

Always pick studies from recent years especially those from the past 10 years. More recent studies can be added only if they are fundamental in way.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized section improves understanding and perception. Instead of writing random summaries, you can divide all the reviews of books into clear sections.

You could organize the chapter in accordance with themes, time period and methodology or even variables researched. For instance, one section could discuss research related to the profitability of a business, while another section may concentrate on liquidity, and another focused on the efficiency of operations.

This format helps evaluaters understand that you're not copying content. You are actually studying it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing is to be professional but easy. Beware of a long, rambling style and unnecessary language. IGNOU seeks simplicity above all else.

Each study you discuss should be listed with the author's name, the year of study, the goal, methodology, and the main findings. However, don't list the findings in a way that is purely mechanical. Try to connect one study to another.

In the case of discussing your findings from one study, refer to how an author's findings were supported or contradicted those findings. This approach of comparing studies adds an additional dimension to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One of the most frequent mistakes is to write the literature review as the kind of chapter in a textbook. Simply explaining concepts such as the definition of accounting and the meaning of management is not a good idea in this section unless it is directly connected to previous studies.

Another error is over-quoting. Your literature review should be written in yourself. Paraphrasing shows understanding, while copying implies dependence.

They are also often unable to link study findings to their own field. Any study you discuss must be in line with the goals of your project.

Linking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most important results of the review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU evaluaters want you to demonstrate what researchers in the past did not realize or where more research is required.

After discussing multiple studies, you'll notice that the majority of studies centered on large organizations however small companies were not considered. In the past, studies utilized secondary data but primary data were not sufficient.

This gap becomes the justification for your Ingou MCOM project. Without it, your program could seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When you write a review of literature the proper citation is crucial. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, but coherence is more important than perfection.

All studies discussed must be included in the reference list at the conclusion of the project. Without references, there is a chance to doubt the authenticity.

Beware of footnotes when writing a literature review. In-text citations are more efficient and appears better in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the review of literature must last. There is no set amount, but for an ignou for an mcom project, the length generally spans from fifteen to -two thousand words.

The length should be determined by the complexity of the topic. A topic that is more extensive requires more study, while a more narrowly-focused topic requires fewer but deeper discussions.

The need to write lengthy reviews that do not include analysis doesn't improve scores.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A researched the bank's performance, and found positive results

Write this in the same way as
Write as this: Author A conducted a research study on banking performance using financial ratios and concluded that profitability improved due to better asset management. This conclusion was later validated by Author B and Author B, who emphasised the importance of operational efficiency in improving returns to banks.

This method is based on understanding and analysis, which is essential to an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get denied or delayed because of copied literature reviews. Even if the reference is to earlier studies, the language has to be distinctly yours.

Make use of plagiarism checking tools whenever feasible and revise content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou project, read the review of literature carefully. Review each article to determine if it is relevant, if the flow is rational, and whether it is linked naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for what my study needs to be done. If the answer is yes that literature study is in the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for a ignou mcom project may feel challenging at first in particular for students who are returning to college after a long absence. If you can realize that it is more about analysis and connecting than memorizing information, the task becomes easier to manage.

Read, think and write in your unique voice. That effort reflects clearly in the final draft and often marks the difference between an average submission and a good one.